ymifrench wrote:

. . . .The lemming-like behavior of the eurotards is fascinating! Like watching a slo-motion train wreck.

Noch ein Blödkopp, den man getrost ignorieren kann - tu ich künftig auch! Also Funkstille ab nun für Trafalgar, Ymifrench und der dicke, doofe Bohnenfresser.

Wulfrun wrote:


Noch ein Blödkopp, den man getrost ignorieren kann - tu ich künftig auch! Also Funkstille ab nun für Trafalgar, Ymifrench und der dicke, doofe Bohnenfresser.

Take some German, a little Latin, a splash of words incompatible in translation from one language to another one, and a whole lot of bullshit and Wulfrun has managed to create a new language for retarded cowards with diarrhea of the mouth.

parigot wrote:

Americans of FF today are a bunch of sissies who need a form of affirmative action to escape their daily Pwnage !

Fox2! Fox2!

Wulfrun has managed to create a new language for retarded cowards with diarrhea of the mouth

diarrhea of the brain, as well. Wulfrun has found the real secret to killing ff.com - bore people to death with boorish bullshit repeated ad nauseam.

FrenchAreToast wrote:

diarrhea of the brain, as well. Wulfrun has found the real secret to killing ff.com - bore people to death with boorish bullshit repeated ad nauseam.

You're hitting the wrong nail.

hawk7 is the boss.

FrenchAreToast wrote:

Wulfrun has found the real secret to killing ff.com - bore people to death with boorish bullshit repeated ad nauseam.

"Boorish bullshit repeated ad nauseam" is (when it's anti-French) the very essence and purpose of FuckFrance, the natural habitat of the boorish bullshitter.

Your criticism encourages me to keep posting - thank you!

I like to bore people to death with the always same bullshit.

Where are the Patton quotes?

Wulfrun wrote:

Your criticism encourages me to keep spamming - thank you!

Time to ban the spammer!!!

Wulfrun wrote:


Noch ein Blödkopp, den man getrost ignorieren kann - tu ich künftig auch! Also Funkstille ab nun für Trafalgar, Ymifrench und der dicke, doofe Bohnenfresser.

JeanValette wrote:

Take some German, a little Latin, a splash of words incompatible in translation from one language to another one, and a whole lot of bullshit and Wulfrun has managed to create a new language

Latin? Where?
There's nothing wrong with my German, pal! Ask any German native speaker. Has your translation software failed you? But since you can't translate it yourself I'll post nothing else in German (it was only in response to Trafalgar's dagospeak).

Here's what I wrote, loosely translated: "Another twat that can be safely ignored - and in future I will. So no more replies to Trafalgar, Ymifrench and the fat spic moron."

Wulfrun wrote:

"Dago" and "spic" are practically the same thing, at last in British English, although "spic" isn't as well known in GB. I read that "dago" is the US term for what we call Wops or Eyeties, but I'll stick to British usage.

I gather 'spic' is more of a US term for BDC types, or failing that 'greaser' or 'beaner'. But if it makes you happier, I'll refer to BDC (if I ever bother replying to his lame posts) as "fat spic moron", or even "fat Mexican moron": I'd like to oblige by being accurate.

Have a nice day, you stupid fascist dago-wannabe.

Dago is derived from the mispronunciation of "diego" as nigger is from "negro". Say both "diego" and "negro" with a thick southern accent and you'll see what i mean. Spic is just short for "hispanic".

geebart wrote:


Dago is derived from the mispronunciation of "diego" as nigger is from "negro". Say both "diego" and "negro" with a thick southern accent and you'll see what i mean. Spic is just short for "hispanic".

Indeed, and Diego is a Spanish name - so I'm uncertain how in US usage "dago" has come to mean Italian (assuming my slang dictionary is correct on this). At any rate, in British usage dagoes are any Spanish and Portuguese speakers, whatever their continent.

So what is the correct term in US usage for BDC? Fat dago moron, fat spic moron or are both correct?

Damn bitch is still screaming. Stuck that fucker good! Go wulfrun go!

"Pwn3r of commie kraut-wannabes" is the term you're looking for.

Achtung, schnell, oink, oink, oink!

Wulfrun wrote:

[q=geebart]
Dago is derived from the mispronunciation of "diego" as nigger is from "negro". Say both "diego" and "negro" with a thick southern accent and you'll see what i mean. Spic is just short for "hispanic"

Indeed, and Diego is a Spanish name - so I'm uncertain how in US usage "dago" has come to mean Italian (assuming my slang dictionary is correct on this). At any rate, in British usage dagoes are any Spanish and Portuguese speakers, whatever their continent.

So what is the correct term in US usage for BDC? Fat dago moron, fat spic moron or are both correct?

The term was broaden to encompass italian americans because of certain racial similarities to Mexicans (for whom the term was first coined in honor of). Namely, thick black hair, tan skin and an oily complexion. Remember, the greater majority of italians who came to the US where from southern italy and Sicily.

Ah yes, that explanation makes sense, so thanks for that snippet of information. And I expect the "oily" complexion is also where the term "greaser" comes from.

BigDaddyCruz wrote:

Damn bitch is still screaming. Stuck that fucker good! Go wulfrun go!

Another Patton quote?

Greaser came from the kids during the 50's who would put Vaseline in their hair (as a precursor to modern hair gel). It is not racial specific, but more of a social norm thing like a "beatnik" or a "hippy".

I'm pretty sure "greaser" as a term for Mexican is a lot older than that, in fact I remember seeing it in accounts of the Mexican War, and it may be even older. Is it still current US usage below the PC radar? Whether it's due to oily complexion or greasy food of whatever, I can't say. Anybody know?

Wulfrun wrote:

I'm pretty sure "greaser" as a term for Mexican is a lot older than that, in fact I remember seeing it in accounts of the Mexican War, and it may be even older. Is it still current US usage below the PC radar? Whether it's due to oily complexion or greasy food of whatever, I can't say. Anybody know?

The only context I've ever heard it used is the one I mentioned above. Take the movie "Grease" for example. I do not doubt that it may have earlier connotations, uses and or origins. However, if you were to say the word today in the US i believe it would conjure the image of the 50's rebels more often than not. However, my vocabulary is biased towards Northeastern norms, possibly in the south it may be a different case. Can any texans confirm or deny?

Your criticism encourages me to keep posting - thank you!

You are welcome. And thank YOU for further verifying my criticism.

FrenchAreToast wrote:

You are welcome. And thank YOU for further verifying my criticism.

Somewhat pedantically, I'd note that I haven't verified your criticism, I think you mean I justified it.

To verify usually implies active checking or investigation, which I obviously haven't done. However I can justify something without becoming active. Please make note of the difference for future reference. I would refer you to any number of good English language dictionaries for more comprehensive definitions and correct usage.

I'm not boring you, am I?

the noble interventions by the mods are long overdue in terms of regulation and enforcement

e.g. banning a retard called BalticTrader.

If anyone had any doubts about Wulfrun being a promiscuous homosexual, his posts on this thread should eliminate them. He is obviously a sodomite with a very limited intellect and a very poor education.

Somewhat pedantically, I'd note that I haven't verified your criticism, I think you mean I justified it.

To verify usually implies active checking or investigation, which I obviously haven't done. However I can justify something without becoming active.

Somewhat pedantically, note that you should say, "Note" or "Please note" instead of "I'd note".

"Substantiated" is probably better word than "verified", but "justified" has a different connotation entirely. For example, "Even though some would argue, I know I am thoroughly justified in calling you an asshole".

FrenchAreToast wrote:

Somewhat pedantically, I'd note that I haven't verified your criticism, I think you mean I justified it.

To verify usually implies active checking or investigation, which I obviously haven't done. However I can justify something without becoming active.

Somewhat pedantically, note that you should say, "Note" or "Please note" instead of "I'd note".

"Substantiated" is probably better word than "verified", but "justified" has a different connotation entirely. For example, "Even though some would argue, I know I am thoroughly justified in calling you an asshole".